Sunday 21 October 2012

Great or Good? The Wayne Rooney Debate

Wayne Rooney the greatest British player of his generation or simply a good player in teams that lack real sparkle. It is perhaps one of the biggest conundrums in English football but how good is the man dubbed the ‘white Pele’ by fans and manager alike?

A decade on from his emergence as a fresh faced 16-year-old in a man’s body it appears that we are still no closer to a definitive answer.

Thirty-two goals in seventy-eight international appearances and one hundred and ninety-nine goals at club level are hardly statistics to be sniffed at. He’s a multiple Premier League winner (4 times), a Champions League Winner and has picked up over a dozen individual accolades ranging from Football Writers and PFA Player of the Year awards (2009-10) to BBC Young Sports Personality of the Year (2002).

Nor can anyone forget moments of magic like the 25-yard volley against Newcastle (2005), his hat-trick at West Ham (2011) or his stupendous overhead kick that won the Manchester Derby in February of the same year and was subsequently named the Premier League Goal of the 20 Seasons'.

Yet many Manchester United and England fans still harbour doubts over the man who learnt his trade on the back streets of Croxteth in Liverpool.

Some even wonder what has happened to the free spirited 18-year-old that terrorised defenders at Euro 2004. Just ask William Gallas and Lillian Thuram about that! Back in those days his talents were being honed at Everton’s antiquated former training base at Bellefield but a big money move (a British record for a teenager) to United catapulted him on to the biggest stage.

A hat-trick on his opening bow against Fenerbahce was more than an encouraging start and he has been utilised in several positions by Sir Alex Ferguson during two transitional periods to become the Reds top dog. When Cristiano Ronaldo waved his goodbyes to head to Real Madrid in the summer of 2009, it was Rooney that picked up the baton scoring 26 league goals to fire United to what was then a record equalling 18th League title.

However critics would argue that his brilliance is too often tempered by frequent injuries, inconsistent performances and off field issues and while it’s true that his career has hit many heights he has never quite been able to eclipse world stars like Ronaldo, Lionel Messi, Xavi Hernandez or Andres Iniesta.

When he retires his career will not be defined by the goals scored against teams like Wigan, Hull, West Ham or Stoke. It will be judged on his performances against the European and World’s elite.

Some will point to his goal at Wembley in the Champions League final against Barcelona as evidence that he is more than capable when pitted against the best but it should not be forgotten that he was a member of a United team comprehensibly outplayed from start to finish in that encounter. Rooney’s other contribution in that game apart from his solitary strike - to ignore instructions to sit on Barca’s midfield anchor-man leaving his team-mates painfully exposed in the centre of the park.

For England, competitions have come and gone since 2004 and as each one ends the question oft repeated centres around how to get the best out of Rooney. So is his star on the wane?

At club level, it was the return from retirement of 37-year-old Paul Scholes and not Rooney’s influence that invigorated a title tilt last term while this year’s start to the season has been mixed.

A lacklustre display at Goodison on the opening day where he clearly looked sluggish and overweight saw him removed from the starting XI to make way for Dutch striker Robin van Persie.

On his return to the United line-up he has operated in a midfield role. It makes use of his good but not electric pace, an ability to ping the ball all over the park, energy to help out defensively and his exceptional positional play. He can of course still be profligate in possession but it at least affords him the opportunity to get the team moving from a deeper position.

Re-employed in a central striking berth yesterday, Rooney opened his account for the season with an own-goal before going on to show the sort of potency that will be required at the other end if United are to overhaul their noisy neighbours and European Champions Chelsea come May. However once again goals masked a performance that was hardly vintage. His passing particularly in a muted first half an hour was remarkably off key and it would be difficult to imagine any of the world's finest players struggling in such a way against hard-working but limited opponents.

Now approaching his peak years, a working class background, stocky build and undoubted talent often make him the subject of comparisons to Paul Gascoigne. When on song, the Geordie was often his team's inspiration but perhaps more significantly and worryingly, Rooney seems to also have inherited identical dietary problems to those previously faced by Gascoigne.

When fit and on song he can undoubtedly provide moments of genius but given his propensity to gain weight and United's injury record reservations must exist surrounding the sort of recovery he'd be capable of should a long-term injury be sustained.

With speed now a prerequisite of the modern day forward Rooney could find himself in a situation faced by many of his senior peers at club and international level who have had to alter style or position to prolong their careers at the highest level.

Ryan Giggs and Paul Scholes would appear to be the finest exponents of this philosophy in recent times, however all this hypothesising could be immaterial should Sir Alex Ferguson decide that Rooney's metamorphosis into a midfielder needs to be accelerated to reinforce a team shorn of a box-to-box player in the mould of Bryan Robson or Roy Keane. It is a role for which he has long seemed unsuited but it may define the second half of his career.

'It's Not About the Bike' and never was for Lance Armstrong

'It's Not About the Bike' and finally the public know the real reasons why it never really was for Lance Armstrong. At last the biggest open secret in sport is out thanks to the USADA's 1,000 page dossier that details the evidence that Lance Armstrong and his former team-mates at the US Postal and the Discovery Channel teams had engaged in widespread doping between 1999 – 2005.

During that period Armstrong had become a hero to many. He had beaten testicular cancer and was beating his rivals out of sight, winning seven consecutive Tour de France titles to eclipse cycling greats like Jacques Anquetil, Bernard Hinault, Miguel Indurain and Eddy Merckx

However, while technology, sports science and equipment have improved since those halcyon days, the USADA’s evidence, which is underpinned by the testimony of 26 witnesses, including 11 former team-mates now reveals why Armstrong reigned for so long.

Here's how an eventful week -  a week from Hell unfolded for Armstrong.
 
11 October

Reports emerge that Armstrong may now be subject to perjury charges after testifying in a 2005 court case that he had never taken banned drugs in order to obtain a $5million (£3million) performance bonus. The company which paid the bonus hints at legal action to retrieve the money.

12 October
 
The International Olympic Committee says it is looking into stripping Armstrong of the bronze medal he won at the 2000 Sydney Games in the individual time trial. Tour de France race director Christian Prudhomme says that results from the Armstrong era should be expunged: “The best solution is to
say that there should be no Tour winner those years.”

13 October
 
Pat McQuaid, the president of the International Cycling Union (UCI), admits that he felt “angry and shocked. That’s as much as I can say.”

14 October


Emma O’Reilly, Armstrong's personal masseuse and assistant in the 1990s, says she was used by the cyclist and former US Postal team director Johan Bruyneel to ferry drugs. Meanwhile Dick Pound former president of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) says that the International Cycling Union (UCI) most likely turned a blind eye to alleged doping by Armstrong and others.
 
15 October

Armstrong’s lawyer, Tim Herman claims that the disgraced cyclist might be willing take a lie-detector test to prove his innocence.

16 October

Former UCI employee Dr Michael Ashenden, criticises the governing bodies decision to accept donations from Armstrong totalling £78,000. Sponsors Oakley and RadioShack publicly admit that they could reconsider their relationship with him.

17 October

Nike terminate their sponsorship ‘due to the seemingly insurmountable evidence that Armstrong participated in doping’ hours after the Texan steps down as chairman of his cancer charity Livestrong. Trek Bicycles, one of his biggest sponsors, and Giro also end their association with the American.


Monday 1 October 2012

Predictable United struggling to adapt to new system

Call it 4-5-1 or 4-2-3-1 (a more convoluted name for essentially the same formation) Sir Alex Ferguson may need to reconsider the system and personnel he deploys if his Manchester United side are going to have anything more than a passing interest come the business end of the season.

Tottenham Hotspur’s win at Old Trafford on Saturday, their first since 1989, only confirmed what many are starting to suspect. This United side is struggling to function with five in midfield.

Going into the game Andre Villas-Boas wouldn’t have needed to study hours and hours of video to work out how to beat United. It has been evident for a while.

At the Etihad in April a five-man United midfield laboured to the extent that had the game been over 180 minutes they still would have failed to create a goal-scoring chance. That meek surrender angered many United fans, who were as confused then as they are now about the employment of a system that renders their side impotent in attack while affording minimal protect to a fragile back-four.

And while the players might have changed over the summer, the recruitment of Shinji Kagawa and Robin van Persie has done little to solve the problem.

At Goodison on the opening day they struggled to create any real chances of note and continued to look vulnerable in defence. The result, a battering at the hands of a Mourane Fellaini inspired Everton.

They got lucky at Southampton, with a combination of factors, including a second-half switch to 4-4-2, the introduction of Paul Scholes and clinical Robin Van Persie finishing coupled with naive defending on the part of the hosts helping to avert disaster.

Galatasaray out-passed and outplayed them in the Champions League, denied only by errant finishing and dubious refereeing. Then just over a week ago United were second best for long periods against a Liverpool side that played 51 of 90 minutes with ten-men following the sending off of Jonjo Shelvey.

So what exactly is going wrong? Sitting in the press box before the home-game against Fulham (another far from convincing display) one journalist told me that United could not afford to be caught using two forwards or playing 4-4-2 against any of Europe’s or the Premier League’s top sides. His view was and still remains that playing two up front would leave United’s midfield over-run and undermanned.

After watching two distinctly different 45 minutes of football over the weekend I would contend that United can ill afford not to return to what they know best.

Playing with a five-man midfield produced just one 20-yard shot via the boot of Nani in a miserable first period and with Carrick and Scholes drawn ever further forward to support a light-weight Kagawa, isolated Van Persie and a wastefully lethargic Giggs, Tottenham were able to capitalise and use the pace and power of Dembele and Bale to great effect and lay the foundations to their success.

Around ten years ago Sir Alex broke with tradition and opted for a midfield quintet in a bid to shore up his defence and make them more unpredictable in Europe.

Back then the Keane-Scholes axis was supplemented by the mercurial Juan Sebastian Veron, however despite the undoubted talents of that particular triumvirate it failed to necessitate the spark and solidity that Ferguson had hoped for.

A ten point title winning margin in 2000-01 turned to a ten point deficit in 01-02, with United trailing home behind Arsenal and Liverpool. The same season they also suffered the ignominy of an away goals defeat to an average Bayer Leverkusen side at the semi-final stage of the Champions League.

And 02-03 looked to be running along the same lines, that is until Laurent Blanc and Veron both picked up injuries that tellingly ruled them out for a significant chunk of the title run-in post Christmas. Without that duo, Ferguson switched back to a tried and tested team and formation. Paul Scholes and Ole Gunnar Solksjaer were used as foils to Ruud Van Nistelrooy and Ferguson’s men collected 51 points from a possible 57 to storm past Chelsea, Newcastle and Arsenal to yet another title.

Of course it’s easy to blame tactics, formations and individuals for poor performances but while Sir Alex would likely not admit it, but for those injuries United wouldn’t have come anywhere near winning the league that year. Many fans believe that but for those timely (or untimely – I suppose it depends on your particular allegiance) crocks Veron and Blanc would have continued to have been picked partly out of blind faith and due to the stubbornness of the manager to admit a failing on his part – i.e. in tactics and team selection.

So fast forward just over a decade and here we are again, except the midfield line-up is nowhere near as impressive. The consistent failing of this season has been predictability and defensive insecurity, the exact issues playing five across midfield is meant to eradicate.

The predictability of:
  • Scholes, Carrick et al having to try and force the ball through congested areas of the pitch to try and find Kagawa or Van Persie.
  • Van Persie & Kagawa being hopelessly outnumbered and isolated when they receive the ball in the final third.
  • United being unable to stretch and get in behind teams.
  • The central midfielders pushing on to try and add their weight & other options to the outnumbered Van Persie & Kagawa.
  • Having redundant wingers who often pick up possession in dead areas or once their opponents are set behind the ball.
  • The restrictions it places upon United to counter quickly by effectively only having one forward option to play through.
  • The open spaces it leaves behind the central midfielders for players to run into and get at the back-four.
Time will tell if tradition or Wayne Rooney come riding into the rescue but most fans will hope that it doesn’t take too many more inept performances or any injuries before Sir Alex considers, that it might just be time for a change.